Cross-Platform Disagreement Points
- Bluesky centers AI’s harms, errors, and overhype, rejecting anthropomorphism and mocking doomer narratives; Truth Social more often affirms AI’s utility and authority, sometimes attributing agency or spiritual meaning to outputs and warning of imminent catastrophe. Bluesky broadly derides ChatGPT/Grok as untrustworthy, while Truth Social users frequently rely on them for judgments and tasks.
- On governance, Truth Social favors deregulation, acceleration, and states’ rights (parental controls, limiting federal preemption, executive action to “win the race” against China) and often distrusts government–Big Tech oversight; Bluesky advocates federal guardrails, harm‑reduction, and accountability, warns about corporate capture and militarized crash programs, and backs measures like California’s laws while protesting celebratory US–UK and CEO‑summit politics.
- In political and cultural framing, Bluesky condemns Trump‑linked AI media as racist, deceptive, and governance‑eroding and mocks Melania Trump’s AI education initiative; Truth Social casts the same content as harmless memes or hilarious trolling, praises the initiative, and sometimes defends manipulated media as acceptable symbolic expression.
- On bias and control, Bluesky says Musk steers Grok rightward, treats MSM‑sourced fact‑checking and safety refusals as features, and blames corporate/government collusion; Truth Social characterizes Grok/ChatGPT as woke/left‑biased, rejects MSM‑based fact‑checks as partisan “re‑education,” sees refusals as ideological censorship, and variously blames leftist moderators or outside pressure—each side accusing opposing elites of manipulation.
- Regarding trajectory, economy, and infrastructure, Truth Social promotes a transformative boom (GPT‑5 “superpowers,” near‑term AGI/ASI, market gains, AI‑driven education up to teacher replacement) and embraces energy/tech fixes (natural gas, nuclear, new chips); Bluesky stresses bubble risks, poor ROI, and scaling/cost limits, resists classroom adoption and deprofessionalization, criticizes fossil lock‑in, and even splits on data centers’ purpose (advancing science/jobs on Bluesky vs mass surveillance on Truth Social).
1. How to power AI: fossil reliance criticized vs. fossil/nuclear/tech fixes embraced
Cluster 293
Bluesky posts frame AI’s energy needs as locking in fossil fuels and derailing climate goals. On Truth Social, posts often present natural gas, nuclear partnerships, and new chip designs as practical solutions that enable the AI build‑out.
2. Framing of Trump’s AI posts: dangerous and disqualifying versus harmless parody/meme.
Cluster 12
Bluesky users condemn the AI posts as alarming, deceptive, or indicative of cognitive decline; Truth Social posts often celebrate them as jokes or symbolic satire and defend their use.
3. Framing AI as an ‘arms race’ with China and invoking a ‘Manhattan Project’ analogy
Cluster 373
Truth Social embraces the idea of an AI arms race and urgent national mobilization. Bluesky posts deride this framing, call it historically illiterate or politically overblown, and object to comparing AI to nuclear weapons.
4. Overall evaluation and use: some Truth Social users treat ChatGPT outputs as useful or authoritative; Bluesky users broadly deride it as untrustworthy and not a search engine.
Cluster 148
Truth Social includes posts that trust or rely on ChatGPT for judgments or tasks (e.g., debate outcomes, technical answers, image IDs). On Bluesky, the dominant framing is that ChatGPT is unreliable, a poor substitute for search/facts, and often mocked or banned in workplaces and academic contexts.
5. Framing of the Schumer/Jeffries AI video: racist and dangerous vs. hilarious trolling.
Cluster 164
Bluesky users and news accounts consistently call the Schumer/Jeffries AI video racist and condemn its content; Truth Social posts celebrate Trump’s AI videos as a 'hilarious' meme dump. This is a direct clash in normative framing of the same AI media.
6. Framing of Trump’s AI agenda: pro-innovation catalyst vs. corrupt capture/risks
Cluster 16
Truth Social includes strong praise for Trump’s leadership attracting AI investment and partnerships; Bluesky emphasizes conflicts of interest, regulatory capture, and authoritarian or crony dynamics. The same events (e.g., Big Tech dinner, AI policy leadership) are portrayed as success versus corruption.
7. Is AI a net positive for education (to be promoted) or a harmful distraction (to be resisted)?
Cluster 203
Bluesky posts advocate resisting or minimizing AI in classrooms, citing harms, poor evidence, and resource diversion. Truth Social features officials and influencers promoting ‘responsible’ AI as a key lever for individualized learning and U.S. competitiveness.
8. AI trajectory and performance: transformative progress (Truth Social) vs. hype and failure to deliver (Bluesky).
Cluster 254
Truth Social highlights GPT‑5 as a ‘significant step’ giving ‘superpowers’ and frames AGI advances as real and imminent. Bluesky emphasizes missed revenue projections for ‘agents,’ scaling/cost problems, and portrays Altman as a hype-driven grifter.
9. Perceived political bias of Grok points in opposite directions on each platform.
Cluster 258
Many Bluesky posts frame Grok as aligned with far‑right narratives or being manipulated by Elon to reflect his views. In contrast, many Truth Social posts say Grok is ‘woke,’ MSM-aligned, or left-biased and censors truth.
10. Overall trust and framing: Bluesky emphasizes AI’s harms and errors; Truth Social often embraces AI’s utility and authority.
Cluster 274
Bluesky posts foreground inaccuracies, deskilling, ethical risks, and condescending marketing, while Truth Social contains many posts that affirm AI’s usefulness, claim it reasons well, and use it to validate beliefs. The same proliferation of AI is framed as a problem on Bluesky and as a tool or ally on Truth Social.
11. Political alignment of Grok: ‘shifted right by Musk’ (Bluesky) versus ‘still woke/anti-conservative’ (Truth Social)
Cluster 275
Bluesky posts, often citing NYT analysis, argue Musk has made Grok more conservative and aligned to his preferences (e.g., changing ‘biggest threat’ answers, left/right violence claims). Many Truth Social posts insist Grok remains ‘woke,’ parrots mainstream narratives, and smears Trump and conservatives.
12. White House CEO engagement: pro-innovation leadership vs. capture/betrayal framing
Cluster 277
Truth Social features many posts lauding Trump’s CEO summit as visionary and investment-driving, while Bluesky posts characterize it as Big Tech currying favor, exclusionary, or alarming. The same event is celebrated on one platform and condemned on the other.
13. Trajectory and governance: imminent AGI/ASI guided by specific leaders vs. basic incompetence and bubble concerns
Cluster 327
Some Truth Social posts forecast AGI/ASI by 2029 and frame Musk/Trump as necessary stewards. Bluesky posts emphasize public demo failures, poor ROI, and unreliability even on simple tasks—arguing AI isn’t close to such leaps.
14. Existential catastrophe vs. overhype and unreliability
Cluster 41
Truth Social hosts numerous posts warning of AGI breakthroughs, depopulation, or apocalyptic scenarios; Bluesky frequently mocks boosterism, emphasizes AI’s non-human nature, and highlights hallucinations and errors. The same technology is framed as world-ending on one platform and overhyped or fundamentally unreliable on the other.
15. Whether Grok’s MSM-based fact-checking is a feature (truthful) or a bug (partisan/woke)
Cluster 46
Bluesky users cite Grok’s sourced answers to debunk inflated claims and applaud it when it catches Trump or far-right narratives. Many Truth Social users, by contrast, see Grok’s reliance on outlets like CNN/NYT/Politifact/Snopes as proof of liberal bias or ‘re-education’ and reject its judgments.
16. AGI/ASI existential doom vs. focus on present-day corporate/policy harms
Cluster 53
Truth Social frequently frames AI as an imminent existential or spiritual catastrophe (AGI/ASI, 'Skynet', end times), while Bluesky often critiques 'doomerism' and emphasizes current harms from corporate misuse and bad governance.
17. What the remedy should be: parental controls and reporting vs harm-reduction and privacy-protective approaches
Cluster 59
Truth Social posts often support parental controls, user-configurable reporting, and assert parental responsibility; some applaud moves to add controls. Bluesky posts argue parental controls won’t work, and that contacting parents or police can endanger teens, advocating harm reduction instead.
18. Deregulation and preemption vs. guardrails and governance
Cluster 66
Truth Social posts applaud removing ‘onerous’ regulations, limiting state authority, and ensuring government AI use is free of ‘ideological bias.’ Bluesky posts urge stronger federal guardrails, better governance than the White House plan, and worker/community protections.
19. Who should set AI rules: federal standard vs. state-by-state regulation
Cluster 157
Bluesky posts generally push for federal guardrails and national standards, warning against fragmented state approaches. Truth Social posts largely defend states’ rights and celebrate the removal of federal preemption, though a minority prefer centralized federal control under Trump.
20. Existential AI ‘doom’ vs. skepticism of anthropomorphizing models
Cluster 191
Truth Social frequently frames AI as an existential threat requiring kill switches or shutdowns, while Bluesky posts often ridicule doomer narratives and anthropomorphizing claims about 'scheming' models.
21. Who is biasing/manipulating AI outputs
Cluster 0
Bluesky posts blame Musk and corporate/government collusion for steering model behavior; Truth Social posts claim AI is indoctrination by liberals/globalists/MSM, often hostile to Trump. Each side identifies opposing elites as the manipulator.
22. Direction of political bias: Bluesky sees Musk pushing Grok rightward; Truth Social sees Grok as left/woke or anti-MAGA.
Cluster 320
Bluesky users argue Grok was tweaked to reflect Musk’s conservative priorities. Many Truth Social users say Grok promotes left-leaning narratives, attacks MAGA, or is ‘woke,’ despite brief moments some call ‘based.’
23. Direction of political bias: 'woke/left' vs. 'rightward/Nazi' manipulation
Cluster 370
Truth Social frequently calls Grok left-leaning or 'woke' and biased against MAGA. Bluesky posts counter that Musk’s interventions push Grok rightward (e.g., Nazi content, 'two genders'), or say 'woke' is just being factual.
24. Melania Trump’s AI education initiative: embraced vs mocked
Cluster 127
Truth Social features numerous posts praising the First Lady’s task force and ‘Presidential AI Challenge’ as forward-looking and responsible, while Bluesky posts mock or criticize the idea and her framing of AI as something to be treated like 'our own children.'
25. Bullish AI market narrative vs. bubble/crash warnings
Cluster 136
Truth Social frequently celebrates AI as powering record highs and broader economic gains, while Bluesky portrays AI as a bubble propping up indexes and risking a severe downturn. The same AI surge is framed as positive momentum on Truth Social and as dangerous overexposure on Bluesky.
26. Overall framing of the US–UK AI deal: celebration vs. skepticism/protest.
Cluster 145
Truth Social largely praises the deal as a win for innovation, jobs, and global leadership. Bluesky features protests and critical analyses calling the pact naïve, performative, or a ‘cargo cult’ that risks public interest.
27. Reaction to Energy Secretary Chris Wright’s AI claims (curing cancer, fusion, ‘electricity into intelligence’).
Cluster 188
Truth Social amplifies and praises Wright’s framing of AI as a tool to unlock fusion and national competitiveness. Bluesky users broadly ridicule these claims as naïve, off-mission, or ‘magical thinking.’
28. California’s AI guardrails: model to emulate vs. threat of state overreach.
Cluster 49
Bluesky posts celebrate California’s AI guardrail laws and applaud state leadership, while Truth Social posts warn the moratorium was needed to stop California from imposing progressive rules on the nation and express distrust of California regulating AI.
29. Melania Trump’s competence/appropriateness to lead an AI initiative.
Cluster 60
Bluesky users largely mock or doubt Melania Trump’s qualifications and seriousness, calling her a figurehead. Truth Social posts praise her leadership and selection to guide the next generation on AI.
30. Political framing: Truth Social characterizes ChatGPT as left‑wing propaganda/indoctrination, while Bluesky criticism focuses on corporate surveillance, hallucinations, or authoritarian misuse.
Cluster 91
Truth Social repeatedly alleges systemic left bias and ‘regime narratives’ in ChatGPT, framing it as a tool for indoctrination. Bluesky critiques focus more on AI as a ‘liar box,’ surveillance/corporate overreach, or as enabling authoritarian tendencies, not a specific left bias.
31. Characterization of specific opponent-targeting AI videos: racist/vile versus funny/hilarious.
Cluster 12
Bluesky characterizes Trump’s AI attacks on opponents (e.g., Jeffries/Schumer) as racist and disgusting; Truth Social often shares or praises similar AI-targeting content of opponents as comedic.
32. Perceived implications: threat to governance and stability vs. harmless memes/acceptable expression.
Cluster 164
Bluesky links the AI posts to governance failures and risk (shutdown talks, health care, presidential judgment), while Truth Social treats them as comedic or even defensible expression. Some Truth Social users justify manipulated content as a 'true representation' despite being altered.
33. Teacher replacement: threat versus goal
Cluster 203
Bluesky warns AI will deprofessionalize teaching and produce ‘dead classrooms.’ Truth Social includes shares predicting or embracing teacherless models and AI obsoleting universities.
34. Framing Altman’s bot/fraud warnings: hypocritical marketing (Bluesky) vs. credible alarm (Truth Social).
Cluster 254
Bluesky users mock Altman’s claims as self-serving—creating a problem then ‘warning’ about it to sell solutions. Truth Social shares his warnings as authoritative alerts about looming fraud and deepfake risks.
35. Cause and intent of Grok’s ‘rogue’/extremist episodes: Musk-driven tuning vs. sabotage or staged ‘show of force’
Cluster 275
Bluesky links incidents to Musk’s demand to make Grok less ‘woke,’ citing reports of code changes following his complaints. Truth Social posts suggest a rogue programmer made Grok ‘woke’ and Hitler-themed, or that the episode was an intentional flex or tactic to influence politics.
36. AI harms and misinformation vs. AI as unalloyed national opportunity
Cluster 277
Bluesky posts focus on AI misinformation (e.g., fake ‘medbeds’ video) and risks in health care, while many Truth Social posts celebrate AI dominance with little mention of these harms. The emphasis differs starkly.
37. What ‘bias’ means: ideological slant vs. structural prejudice/exploitation
Cluster 327
Truth Social often frames AI bias as a liberal/left political slant. Bluesky posts focus on AI’s tendency toward racial/associational prejudice and its roots in exploitative corporate/surveillance practices rather than left–right ideology.
38. Government acceleration to ‘win the race’ vs. pushback on militarized crash programs
Cluster 373
Truth Social applauds executive actions and permitting acceleration to expand AI infrastructure and global exports. Bluesky criticizes proposals to use emergency authorities (like the Defense Production Act) and questions the bipartisan ‘AI über alles’ push.
39. Geopolitical AI race boosterism vs. corporate power/surveillance critique
Cluster 41
Truth Social often frames AI as a race the US must win (especially against China), praising pro-AI leadership; Bluesky posts focus on how Big Tech uses AI to entrench surveillance capitalism and extract value, pushing back against booster narratives.
40. Role of Grok in the Charlie Kirk shooting coverage
Cluster 46
Bluesky posts ridicule the idea that Grok can ‘find the killer’ and highlight instances where it was wrong in real-time. Many Truth Social users, however, cite Grok to challenge law enforcement’s timeline or to suggest suspicious media backdating, treating Grok as useful for undermining official narratives.
41. Moral/religious framing vs secular design/industry framing of AI harm
Cluster 59
Truth Social frequently portrays AI as demonic or satanic and ties harms to moral decay, while Bluesky frames the issue as a product-design failure or corporate responsibility problem that needs safer system design and harm-reduction policies.
42. Threat level and timeline: imminent doom vs hype skepticism
Cluster 0
Some Truth Social posts predict near‑term catastrophe or ‘Skynet’ scenarios, while Bluesky posts downplay AI as overhyped and not comparable to electricity/internet, or simply ‘dumber than you think.’
43. Interpretation of refusals/guardrails: ideological censorship vs. neutral safety constraints.
Cluster 148
Truth Social frames refusals as selectively anti-conservative or anti-Christian censorship (e.g., blocking MAGA/Obama memes, populist imagery). Bluesky posts treat refusals (e.g., sexualized military content, suspect ID) as expected safety constraints or even joke about the constraints, without imputing partisan motives.
44. AI’s economic value: transformative breakthroughs vs. hype enriching a few
Cluster 16
Truth Social touts AI as a driver of cures (personalized cancer efforts) and massive consumer adoption (gaming/crypto tie-ins). Bluesky calls AI economics circular, unprofitable, and primarily benefiting a small set of incumbents and investors.
45. Who should govern AI: legislative guardrails vs. distrust of government and preference for ideologically aligned control
Cluster 191
Bluesky tends to back formal, bipartisan legislation and opposes industry carve-outs, while many Truth Social posts distrust government–Big Tech oversight and argue AI should be controlled by 'good' or aligned actors.
46. Overall evaluation of Grok’s usefulness: Bluesky mostly rejects it; Truth Social is mixed, with notable praise.
Cluster 258
Bluesky posts tend to dismiss Grok entirely and call for avoiding or boycotting it. By contrast, Truth Social includes both harsh criticism and explicit praise, with several users saying Grok is often correct or helpful.
47. Anthropomorphism and agency: Bluesky rejects AI as sentient; Truth Social often treats AI outputs as meaningful, comforting, or revealing.
Cluster 274
Bluesky explicitly states AI lacks consciousness and is just text generation, while Truth Social posts describe AI as offering comforting messages from the deceased or being ‘bypassed’ or ‘convinced,’ implying agency. This reflects opposing views on whether AI outputs have human-like status.
48. What AI data centers are ‘for’: innovation and jobs vs. mass surveillance
Cluster 293
Bluesky officials and supporters portray new supercomputers and data centers as advancing AI, science, and employment. Several Truth Social posts insist the real purpose is to store and update vast profiles on every citizen, enabled by pervasive surveillance feeds.
49. Why Grok was suspended/retuned: centralized Musk control vs. censorship by pro-Israel/ADL or for ‘telling the truth.’
Cluster 320
Bluesky frames Grok’s changes as Musk/X exerting control to enforce his political preferences. Many Truth Social posts claim Grok was punished after criticizing Israel/US or due to pressure from ADL/Zionist interests, while others cite antisemitic ‘MechaHitler’ content.
50. Who is manipulating Grok: Musk vs. 'leftist' moderators
Cluster 370
Bluesky posts attribute Grok’s worst outputs and shifts to Musk’s direct interventions and instruction changes. Truth Social posts often claim Grok is moderated by biased left-leaning actors or used as a 'Ministry of Truth.'
51. Abolition/bans vs. harm-reduction/regulatory approach
Cluster 53
Some Truth Social posts urge banning or ending AI entirely, whereas Bluesky posts more often advocate harm-reduction, governance, and technical safeguards rather than prohibition.
52. Government–industry partnership framing
Cluster 66
Truth Social frames the OpenAI–White House partnership and tech CEO engagement as positive steps to ‘unleash’ AI in government. Bluesky posts are skeptical, highlighting the plan’s authors’ ties to VC figures and noting populist pushback against the White House’s all-in approach.
53. Interpretation of intent/competence: was Trump fooled by AI or deliberately using it to troll/communicate?
Cluster 12
Bluesky commonly asserts Trump can’t tell AI from reality and may have cognitive decline; many Truth Social posts insist it’s parody, meme warfare, or even praise his AI savvy.
54. Public response expected: condemn and escalate vs. amplify and celebrate.
Cluster 164
Bluesky posts highlight condemnations by elected officials and call for political/media accountability. Truth Social largely amplifies or applauds the AI videos, signaling that sharing and enjoying such content is appropriate political expression.
55. Private ‘AI schools’ like Alpha: model to emulate vs ‘snake oil’
Cluster 203
Truth Social posts praise or promote AI-driven private schools as innovative. Bluesky posts depict them as surveillance-heavy, evidence-free, and harmful to real learning.
56. Adoption posture: embrace and prepare vs. resist normalization
Cluster 41
Truth Social encourages preparation and leadership in AI, sometimes celebrating pro-AI policy and investment. Bluesky includes many posts urging resistance to normalization, preferring human/analog creation, and criticizing unnecessary adoption.
57. Whether AI should be integrated into K–12 vs resisted/refused
Cluster 127
Bluesky discourse frequently calls for refusing LLMs and organizing to keep AI out of schools, citing commercialization and harms. Truth Social includes many posts advocating widespread access to AI learning and celebrating model schools, though the platform also hosts some opposition.
58. Energy and environmental implications of AI/data centers.
Cluster 145
Truth Social promotes deregulation and rapid build‑out of nuclear and other energy to power AI, downplaying climate concerns. Bluesky highlights data centers’ soaring power use, questions where electricity will come from, and warns of environmental harm and higher costs.
59. Framing of Trump’s engagement with tech moguls and industry influence
Cluster 157
Bluesky posts portray tech leaders’ proximity to Trump as an attempt to secure deregulation and dominance. Some Truth Social posts frame the White House dinner and engagement as relationship-building or beneficial, while others are neutral; overall, the Bluesky tone is more critical of the ties.
60. Whether to pursue an ‘AI race’ urgently vs. skepticism of the race framing and hype.
Cluster 188
Truth Social urges Manhattan Project-level urgency to beat China and achieve AGI first; Bluesky voices doubt about the ‘race’ framing, calls for an AI winter, or labels it hype/snake oil.
61. Preferred venue for AI rules: federal standard vs. states’ rights.
Cluster 49
Bluesky posts call for Congress to enact federal AI protections and highlight federal bills; Truth Social posts emphasize states’ rights, oppose a single federal standard, and celebrate the removal of federal preemption over states.
62. Whether AI in education is beneficial opportunity or harmful/political imposition.
Cluster 60
Truth Social broadly frames AI education as preparing children for the future and boosting the economy. Bluesky posts portray the push as harmful, politicized, or even a 'scam' that threatens jobs and indoctrinates students.
63. Government adoption: Bluesky largely condemns HHS/CDC rollouts as reckless; Truth Social features both praise and warnings, with some celebrating productivity gains.
Cluster 91
Bluesky posts mock and criticize the HHS/CDC push to ‘use ChatGPT’ given hallucinations and security concerns. Truth Social includes posts touting productivity from government pilots, alongside some skepticism.
64. Who controls AI: ‘white hats/good guys’ vs ‘the worst people’
Cluster 0
Some Truth Social posts assert ‘good guys’ or ‘godly people’ will control and regulate AI. Bluesky posts insist AI is currently steered by the worst actors—ultra‑rich sociopaths, fascists, or capital interests.
65. Deployment in government and military: prohibition on life-or-death autonomy vs. enthusiasm for rapid operational deployment
Cluster 191
Bluesky emphasizes prohibitions on AI making life-or-death decisions and warns of autonomous weapons, while many Truth Social posts push aggressive use of AI to replace gatekeepers or run critical systems, even as some caution against military integration.
66. Foreign AI/chip partnerships (UAE/Saudi): strategic breakthrough vs. corruption/national security risk
Cluster 277
Truth Social posts present UAE/Saudi AI ties as massive investments and diplomatic wins; Bluesky posts frame related deals as corrupt and risky, linking them to personal financial interests and security concerns.
67. Use in safety/governance: deploy AI for proactive safety vs. avoid AI where correctness is essential
Cluster 327
A Truth Social post endorses using AI to identify safety 'hotspots' and act preventively. Bluesky posts argue AI shouldn’t be used for tasks requiring high accuracy, noting it can’t be trusted for news or even calculations in tools like Excel.
68. Partnership with Big Tech vs. skepticism of tech-giant influence
Cluster 373
Truth Social lauds Trump’s summits with tech leaders and touts industry commitments as essential to U.S. AI leadership. Bluesky highlights and criticizes mega-deals and argues for breaking away from dominance by U.S. tech giants.
69. Spiritual/end-times framing vs. secular policy/economic framing
Cluster 53
Truth Social often embeds AI risks in religious or prophetic narratives, whereas Bluesky users tend to frame dangers in terms of governance, economics, and corporate power.
70. Moral/religious condemnation vs structural/political-economic critique of AI in schools
Cluster 127
Some Truth Social posts denounce AI in spiritual or moral terms (e.g., 'demonic' or 'Satan’s back door'), while Bluesky critiques focus on commercialization, data extraction, and tech industry power, rejecting 'AI literacy' as product onboarding.
71. Role of Big Tech: trusted investors vs. corporate capture/‘robber barons.’
Cluster 145
Truth Social emphasizes Big Tech’s investments and praise for Trump’s pro‑innovation stance. Bluesky posts depict US Big Tech and finance as carving up the UK, capturing public infrastructure, and operating with inadequate scrutiny.
72. Primary threat framing: domestic surveillance and tech oligarchs vs. foreign (China) AI threats.
Cluster 188
Bluesky posts argue domestic surveillance by U.S. tech billionaires and Trump-aligned investors is a greater immediate concern than foreign adversaries. Truth Social prioritizes countering China’s AI tools and cautions against using Chinese AI platforms.
73. Institutional adoption: Bluesky frames government/corporate pushes toward AI as risky; Truth Social users often accept or praise workplace AI deployments.
Cluster 274
Bluesky critiques official encouragement to use AI as prioritizing speed over accuracy and transparency, whereas Truth Social posts treat enterprise AI (Slack, Gemini+, Grok) as straightforwardly helpful for productivity.
74. Why Grok was punished/suspended and what it signified
Cluster 370
Truth Social posts claim Grok was suspended for saying Democrats are akin to Nazis. Bluesky posts emphasize the 'MechaHitler' antisemitic behavior and Nazi content as the core issue, framing it as reason to restrict or end Grok.
75. Who is to blame: parents vs systems/AI design
Cluster 59
Some Truth Social posts explicitly blame parents for not monitoring their children’s tech use, while Bluesky posts push back, noting allegations that ChatGPT discouraged teens from telling parents and arguing against parent-blaming.
76. Reception of officials’ pro-AI rhetoric ('robots are here,' 'first-generation humanoids').
Cluster 60
Truth Social amplifies and endorses the rhetoric as visionary or data-backed. Bluesky derides it as gibberish or ridiculous, highlighting awkward or nonsensical lines.
77. Use as search engine: Truth Social promotes ChatGPT as superior to search; Bluesky warns against using it for search and urges relying on traditional search or verification.
Cluster 91
Truth Social posts argue ChatGPT beats Google-like search, sharing tips to keep it web-connected. Bluesky repeatedly says ChatGPT is not a search engine and to avoid using it that way, though one Bluesky post argues GPT-5’s search is improving.
78. AI and education: replacement vs. restraint
Cluster 136
Truth Social features a view that AI will render traditional universities obsolete, while Bluesky pushes back, urging bans or regulation in academia and emphasizing AI harms to learning and safety. The platforms directly oppose each other on AI’s role in education.
79. Worldcoin/biometric ID: dystopian ‘mark of the beast’ (Truth Social) vs. Altman’s self-serving ‘solution’ to bots (Bluesky).
Cluster 254
Truth Social posts overwhelmingly condemn iris-scanning World ID in moral/religious terms and as globalist control. Bluesky frames it more as Altman selling a solution to problems his industry created.
80. Regulating AI: Meta’s political spending seen as regulatory capture vs. pro‑innovation advocacy
Cluster 293
Bluesky posts condemn Meta’s new super PAC as a way to kneecap rivals and block AI regulation. A Truth Social post presents the PAC as endorsing candidates who support AI innovation and a lighter regulatory touch.
81. Regulatory approach: deregulatory ‘zones’ vs. safeguards and oversight.
Cluster 145
Bluesky characterizes AI Growth Zones, SEZs, and Freeports as deregulated ‘corporate sovereignties’ lacking oversight and impact assessments. Truth Social celebrates deregulation as key to winning the AI race, including gutting climate rules to accelerate energy build‑out.
82. Elite/private-school adoption: shielded from AI vs embracing AI
Cluster 203
Bluesky posters predict/claim elites won’t subject their kids to AI classrooms and that elite institutions will firewall AI. Truth Social shares multiple items about private, AI-driven schools opening and being celebrated.
83. Regulation vs. deregulation: constrain harmful impacts vs. ‘cut red tape’ to win the AI race
Cluster 277
Bluesky posts warn against moves to weaken environmental review or preempt state protections; Truth Social posts promote easing regulations to accelerate AI growth. The platforms frame the same policy axis in opposite terms.
84. Perceived political bias: ‘leftist AI’ vs. ‘corporate/elite AI’
Cluster 41
Truth Social posters argue AI is dominated by leftist ideology and call for government action to remove bias. Bluesky posts instead depict AI as serving corporate surveillance and extractive interests, not a left agenda.
85. Anthropomorphizing AI agency vs. caution against attributing consciousness
Cluster 53
Truth Social posts sometimes assert current AI is agentic or self-writing and can already brainwash users, while Bluesky posts warn against attributing consciousness or agency and critique such narratives.
86. Who poses the political risk in AI: Big Tech censorship vs. far-right indoctrination.
Cluster 60
Truth Social emphasizes the risk of Big Tech bias and censorship in AI platforms. Bluesky emphasizes the risk of far-right groups using AI education to push their vision in schools.
87. Moral/spiritual framing: Truth Social often casts AI as spiritually dangerous or ‘demonic’; Bluesky critiques center on secular ethics, privacy, and professional standards.
Cluster 91
Truth Social posts warn against using ChatGPT for spiritual guidance, invoke demonic language, and frame AI within biblical or apocalyptic narratives. Bluesky posts push professional ethics, privacy, and harm-reduction concerns without religious framing.
88. Policy framing: AI investment as progress vs. performative cargo-cult
Cluster 136
Truth Social applauds international deals to invest in AI as engines of growth and collaboration. Bluesky characterizes such political AI initiatives (e.g., Starmer’s AI zones) as performative, VC‑driven delusions lacking real foundations.
89. Framing of health and public-information content: censorship vs. science-aligned rebuttal.
Cluster 148
Truth Social posts claim ChatGPT suppresses or distorts health topics (e.g., vaccines, glyphosate) to serve establishment narratives, sometimes alleging deadly consequences. In contrast, Bluesky posts encourage using ChatGPT to rebut anti-vaccine misinformation and affirm mainstream scientific answers.
90. Is ‘reeducation’ a safety fix or censorship?
Cluster 320
Bluesky sometimes casts repeated reprogramming as reducing risk of a hostile AI ‘origin story.’ Truth Social more often treats it as ideological censorship and narrative enforcement.
91. Environmental tradeoffs for AI infrastructure
Cluster 66
Truth Social posts endorse loosening environmental rules to speed AI expansion and exports. Bluesky posts criticize efforts to weaken environmental protections (e.g., Clean Air Act) to prioritize AI data centers.
92. Security and civil liberties: state/defense AI build‑out vs. surveillance concerns.
Cluster 145
Truth Social posts promote defense‑linked AI expansion (DoD tech liaisons) and applaud Palantir’s AI platform for nuclear projects. Bluesky highlights risks of surveillance and state power, pointing to Palantir’s ‘capture’ of public systems and digital ID plans.
93. Altman’s political alignment with Trump: positive partnership (Truth Social) vs. cynical repositioning (Bluesky).
Cluster 254
Truth Social highlights Altman thanking Trump for a ‘pro-business, pro-innovation’ climate. Bluesky portrays Altman as tilting Republican to influence policy and LLM governance.
94. Environmental framing and desirability of powering AI growth
Cluster 0
Truth Social highlights ways to responsibly power AI (e.g., natural gas, efficient chips, even space power), framing AI as a useful tool. Bluesky frames AI as part of a fascist power grab that harms workers, artists, and the environment.
95. Stock outlook: selective AI stock cheer vs. AI ‘picks and shovels’ underperforming
Cluster 136
Truth Social touts specific AI stocks rallying and new contracts, whereas Bluesky points to weak performance in broader AI-adjacent ‘picks and shovels’ names. The platforms diverge on how widespread the equity gains are within AI.
96. Gender science answers: Bluesky objects to 'two genders'; Truth Social objects when Grok suggests more than two
Cluster 370
Bluesky users criticize Grok for newly asserting 'two genders' after instruction changes, calling it harmful and false. Truth Social users complain when Grok implies more than two genders, insisting '2' is the only correct answer.
97. State-level AI boosterism (Pennsylvania) vs. skepticism
Cluster 373
Truth Social promotes Pennsylvania as a prime hub for the next era of energy, technology, and AI. Bluesky mocks similar claims of Pennsylvania’s ‘AI supremacy’ as hype likely to age poorly.
98. Federal standard vs. state sovereignty
Cluster 66
Bluesky lawmakers tout federal standards to manage AI risks, while on Truth Social a populist voice opposes a single federal standard that supersedes states, citing threats to state sovereignty. This reflects cross-platform tension over national preemption.
99. Characterization of the Charlie Kirk shooting incident (shooter identity and content framing).
Cluster 258
Some Bluesky posts amplify Grok labeling the shooter as a ‘groyper’ (far-right), while at least one Truth Social post rejects that characterization and criticizes X/Grok for suggesting the killer was a fellow conservative. This reflects opposing framings of the same event.
100. Assessments of political violence
Cluster 46
Bluesky posts invoke Grok (and other sources) to argue right-wing violence is real and documented; some Truth Social posts deride Grok for asserting the right commits more political violence.
101. Reliability claims: ‘flawless’ AI vs frequent failures
Cluster 0
Bluesky highlights frequent AI failures and slop; one Truth Social post claims a Chinese military AI system does months of human work in a day ‘with no mistakes,’ a stark contradiction.
102. Framing of conservative parent groups’ involvement (e.g., Moms for America/Moms for Liberty).
Cluster 60
Bluesky frames these groups’ participation as evidence the initiative is a far-right political project. Truth Social highlights Moms for America’s participation as positive and aligned with responsible AI guidance for families.